The paper presents a systematic taxonomy of blocking criteria across ISO/OSI layers: circumstance-based (addresses including sender/receiver/kind/physical location; timing including send time, receive time, duration, frequency; data-transfer properties; services including protocols, names, addresses) and content-based (file type/MIME, statistical detection of encrypted or compressed data, pattern matching for keywords or phrases, and website fingerprinting via request-count/byte-volume signatures).

The paper proposes using CAPTCHAs (hard AI problems) to gate forwarder-list access, forcing the blocker to expend human resources solving every puzzle while each blockee solves only one. However, a 'stealing cycles from humans' attack allows a censor to relay CAPTCHAs to unwitting third parties (e.g., visitors to an attacker-operated website) who solve them on the censor's behalf.

§5.3 defense

NAT and firewalls make volunteer forwarders (JAPR) unreachable for inbound connections by default, removing the incentive for volunteers to reconfigure their systems for no personal benefit. The design response is to reverse the connection direction — JAPR initiates contact with JAPB — shifting the NAT/firewall configuration burden to the motivated blockee who gains direct benefit from solving it.

§6.4 deployment

For a secure steganographic system the embedding ratio is at least 1:10, meaning 1 MB of web content requires 10 MB of transmitted cover data; for a system robust against active attacks (e.g., StirMark bilinear distortions) the ratio is probably 1:100. A censor need not break the steganographic algorithm with high accuracy — suspicion alone is sufficient, since the censor can probe suspected nodes directly by acting as a blockee.

§5.1 evaluation

The protocol between blockee and volunteer forwarder is designed to be transport-layer independent from the outset, allowing substitution of plain TCP with SSL tunnels, SMTP, or steganographic channels as the censor escalates detection. The system is intentionally deployed in a weak initial form to observe how quickly and in what manner the censor adapts, then hardened iteratively based on measured censor behavior.

§6.2 defense

Table 1 of the survey documents that by 2013–2014 censors were deploying simultaneous blocking across BGP, DNS, IP/port filtering, TCP disruption, TLS, and application-layer keyword filtering. No single detection tool in the survey covers all six layers; the most comprehensive, OONI (2012), covers DNS, IP/port, TCP, TLS, keyword, and HTTP but notes only partial BGP coverage.

2015-aceto-internet Table 1 bgp-hijackdns-poisoningport-blockingip-blockingrst-injectiontls-fingerprintkeyword-filteringdpi

The June 2025 Iran shutdown—carried out during the Iran-Israel war beginning ~June 19—did not use BGP route withdrawals as in 2019. Instead, authorities applied service-level restrictions at the national border: DNS poisoning of foreign destinations, protocol whitelisting permitting only pre-approved domestic services, and DPI to block circumvention-tool traffic. Iran's international traffic fell roughly 90% while the country's BGP routes remained advertised, making the shutdown invisible to BGP-based monitoring systems. OONI measurement volume, which totalled 121,333 in June 2025, collapsed to under 200 submissions on June 19-20.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement Executive Summary / §2 dpidns-poisoningport-blockingip-blocking

During the June 2025 shutdown, Iranian authorities blocked international One-Time Password (OTP) SMS delivery, preventing new sign-ins to foreign secure-messaging platforms and VPN services. This forced users toward government-approved domestic platforms that lack security and privacy protections. The blockade of OTPs effectively weaponized account-recovery flows as a secondary shutdown layer, disproportionately affecting users who needed to activate new circumvention tools during the crisis.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement §Human Rights Implications port-blockingdpikeyword-filtering

Amnesty International's 102-page investigation identifies a multi-vendor surveillance stack deployed in Pakistan: Chinese DPI (Geedge/MESA-derived), Canadian social-media monitoring (Netsweeper), and Emirati commercial spyware (Pegasus and FinFisher). The system enables deep packet inspection, SNI-based filtering, and traffic-shape classification at national scale, including targeted interception of encrypted messaging apps and VPN traffic.

2025-amnesty-pakistan-shadows §3, §5 dpisni-blockingip-blockingtraffic-shapeml-classifier

VPN search demand in Iran spiked approximately 707% during the June 2025 stealth blackout, as measured by Top10VPN analytics, making it one of the highest-documented circumvention-demand spikes associated with a single shutdown event. Despite this demand, many VPN connections failed because the protocol whitelist eliminated non-HTTPS tunneling methods and HTTP-level filters could detect known VPN signatures on port 443.

2025-aryapour-stealth-blackout §1, §5 dpiport-blockingtraffic-shape

InterSecLab's 76-page analysis of the Geedge/MESA leak (based on nine months of indexing and translating >100,000 documents) characterizes the Tiangou Secure Gateway (TSG) product line as a commercially deployable detection stack that combines deep packet inspection, real-time mobile subscriber monitoring, active probing, ML-based traffic classifiers, and granular per-region rule sets. TSG is not a research prototype — leaked documentation includes deployment timelines and client government interactions for Kazakhstan, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Myanmar, and one unnamed country, with censorship rules explicitly tailored to each region.

2025-interseclab-internet-coup §3–§5 (InterSecLab report) dpiactive-probingml-classifiersni-blockingip-blockingtraffic-shapefully-encrypted-detect