Spam-cloaked censorship measurements were correctly classified as spam by Proofpoint (the authors' university spam filter), validating surveillance evasion; separately, MX queries sent from a PlanetLab node in China confirmed that the GFW injected bad A DNS responses for both A-record and MX-record lookups for twitter.com and youtube.com, validating measurement accuracy.

Beverly et al. found that 77% of Internet clients can spoof source addresses within their own /24 and 11% can spoof within their own /16, with these characteristics holding across a wide range of countries and regions. The authors use this result to argue that IP-spoofed cover traffic — where measurement probes appear to originate from many hosts in the same AS — is broadly feasible in practice.

§4.2 defense

The authors argue that it is almost certainly impossible to eliminate — or even definitively quantify — the risk to users who perform censorship measurements, because surveillance system capabilities are rapidly evolving and in some cases unknowable; retribution in adversarial environments may not follow due process. The paper explicitly states that its techniques had not been deployed on real networks as of writing because "a better consideration of the associated risks is warranted."

§6–§7 policy

Surveillance systems are fundamentally more selective than censorship systems due to storage constraints: as of 2009 the NSA could store only 7.5% of received traffic across 592 tapped 10 Gbps links with only 69 10 Gbps backhaul links, and the authors' campus network retains non-alert metadata for ~36 hours and IDS alerts for ~1 year. Censorship systems by contrast are transaction-focused and retain only enough data to process real-time requests. This asymmetry creates an exploitable gap: traffic that does not stand out from the population is discarded before reaching human analysts.

§2.1–§2.2 evaluation

Analysis of two days of leaked censorship log files from Syria shows that 1.57% of the population accessed at least one censored site — a proportion the authors argue is far too large for a user-focused surveillance system to pursue individually. This implies that simply flagging all users who access censored content is not a feasible targeting strategy for surveillance.

§2.2 evaluation

The June 2025 Iran shutdown—carried out during the Iran-Israel war beginning ~June 19—did not use BGP route withdrawals as in 2019. Instead, authorities applied service-level restrictions at the national border: DNS poisoning of foreign destinations, protocol whitelisting permitting only pre-approved domestic services, and DPI to block circumvention-tool traffic. Iran's international traffic fell roughly 90% while the country's BGP routes remained advertised, making the shutdown invisible to BGP-based monitoring systems. OONI measurement volume, which totalled 121,333 in June 2025, collapsed to under 200 submissions on June 19-20.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement Executive Summary / §2 dpidns-poisoningport-blockingip-blocking

Encrypted DNS protocols (DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS via Cloudflare 1.1.1.1, Google 8.8.8.8, AdGuard, or NextDNS) prevent DNS injection by encrypting the resolver query, making it opaque to in-path GFW middleboxes. The blog recommends these as a lightweight defense that avoids the maintenance overhead of static hosts entries.

2026-anon-6-github-dns §2 使用加密 DNS 服务 dns-poisoning

The GFW blocks GitHub by hijacking DNS resolution to incorrect IP addresses, causing browser timeouts ('github.com 响应时间太长'). The poisoning can be confirmed by comparing nslookup results against a clean resolver (8.8.8.8) versus the local ISP resolver — divergent results confirm injection.

2026-anon-6-github-dns §5 验证 DNS 污染 dns-poisoning

Static /etc/hosts bindings that hardcode correct IPs (e.g. 140.82.113.3 for github.com, 185.199.108.153 for assets-cdn.github.com) bypass DNS-injection blocking entirely, but the blog warns that GitHub IP addresses change and the file must be updated periodically to remain effective.

2026-anon-6-github-dns §1 手动修改 Hosts 文件 dns-poisoning

Chinese users treat full proxy/VPN (Shadowsocks, V2Ray/Clash, commercial VPNs) as the '终极大杀器' (ultimate solution) for bypassing GitHub DNS poisoning, implying that lighter-weight DNS-only fixes fail in some network environments where the censor adds firewall-layer blocking beyond DNS.

2026-anon-6-github-dns §3 使用代理或 VPN dns-poisoningip-blocking

Rule-based proxy tools (Clash, Shadowsocks, V2Ray) are documented as the most reliable solution for accessing GitHub from China, with split-tunneling rules routing only GitHub traffic through the proxy while keeping domestic traffic on the direct path. Git command-line tools require explicit proxy configuration (git config --global http.proxy http://127.0.0.1:7890) to route clone/push operations, as they do not inherit system proxy settings automatically.

2026-anon-github-2026-6-dns §方法二 dns-poisoningip-blocking