GhostPost's client-server coordination channel transfers only metadata and small text payloads, making it neither bandwidth-intensive nor latency-sensitive. The paper explicitly concludes that 'practically any means of communication, including low-performance covert channels, are adequate' for the coordination channel, enabling operation over DNS tunnels, steganographic channels, or other constrained transports when the central server's HTTPS endpoint is blocked.
From 2016-douglas-ghostpost — GhostPost: Seamless Restoration of Censored Social Media Posts
· §2.1
· 2016
· Free and Open Communications on the Internet
Implications
Design censored-content distribution architectures to decouple the coordination/metadata channel (low-bandwidth) from bulk content delivery, so each can independently use the most suitable transport under blocking.
Explicitly budget for covert-channel constraints when specifying coordination protocol overhead — systems that keep coordination payloads under ~1 KB per exchange remain viable over DNS or steganographic transports.