CDNBrowsing of full-CDN content imposes near-zero operational cost on circumvention operators because all bandwidth is paid by the censored content publisher via their CDN contract; dynamic mirrors for partial-CDN sites impose negligible additional load compared to proxy-based systems — measured traffic relayed by CDNReaper dynamic mirrors versus the meek pluggable transport for sample sites was nearly negligible, while meek has cost Tor $26,536 total ($2,479/month at the time of measurement) despite a 1.5–3 MB/s per-user bandwidth cap and a discounted research grant rate.
From 2016-zolfaghari-practical — Practical Censorship Evasion Leveraging Content Delivery Networks
· §2.5, §5.2.2
· 2016
· Computer and Communications Security
Implications
For sustainability at scale, circumvention infrastructure that shifts bandwidth costs onto content publishers (CDN-hosted targets) rather than volunteer relay operators avoids the funding bottleneck that caps proxy-based transports like meek.
Operational cost savings from CDNBrowsing come with a restriction to CDN-hosted destinations; designers should evaluate whether the target censored content library is predominantly CDN-hosted before committing to a proxy-less architecture.