If India deployed centralized filtering at its key ASes, approximately 121,931 foreign-origin paths (1.15% of all Internet paths to censored sites worldwide) that transit Indian ASes would experience collateral blocking, affecting non-Indian users in Finland, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the US, and elsewhere who have no connection to Indian censorship law.

Only 4 Indian ASes are needed to intercept >90% of AS-level paths from all Indian ASes to censored sites; 10 ASes cover ~95% of paths. Fewer than 5,000 edge routers spread across those ASes would suffice for nationwide IP filtering, with ~70% of those routers belonging to just two private ISPs (Bharti Airtel AS9498 and Tata Comm. AS4755).

§4.1, Table 2, Table 3 evaluation

Any one of five Indian ASes — each needing control of only its BGP-speaking routers — can individually censor traffic for all ~896 Indian ASes via IP prefix hijacking. For example, AS4755 (Tata Comm.) fake advertisements can impact 955 ASes total (896 Indian + 41 foreign); AS9730 (Bharti Telesonic) requires as few as 7 edge routers to execute such an attack.

§4.3, Table 4 evaluation

Eight Indian ASes can collectively intercept 99.14% of AS-level paths connecting all Indian ASes to DNS resolvers, including GoogleDNS and OpenDNS; 4,906 routers across these 8 ASes suffice to launch DNS injection attacks covering the entire country. The same 8 ASes also appear among the 10 key ASes identified for IP filtering.

§4.2 evaluation

India's federated censorship model — each ISP independently enforces government blacklists — produces dramatically inconsistent filtering: Airtel censored only 1 of 50 pornographic sites probed, while MTNL censored 45 of 50; Reliance Jio censored 0 sites across all 540 test URLs. A well-informed user can escape censorship through a judicious choice of ISP.

§3.1, Table 1 evaluation

Article 19 documents that Iran's National Information Network (NIN / SHOMA) was designed with explicit reference to China's Great Firewall as a model, with institutional mirroring: Iran's Supreme Council of Cyberspace parallels China's Cyberspace Administration of China, and both governments share a "cyber sovereignty" doctrine used to justify domestic content controls and cross-border technology transfer. The report frames Iran's filtering infrastructure as deliberately architected to replicate GFW capabilities, not as an independently developed system.

2026-article19-tightening-the-net §2, §3 dpisni-blockingdns-poisoningip-blockingbgp-hijackthrottling

Table 1 of the survey documents that by 2013–2014 censors were deploying simultaneous blocking across BGP, DNS, IP/port filtering, TCP disruption, TLS, and application-layer keyword filtering. No single detection tool in the survey covers all six layers; the most comprehensive, OONI (2012), covers DNS, IP/port, TCP, TLS, keyword, and HTTP but notes only partial BGP coverage.

2015-aceto-internet Table 1 bgp-hijackdns-poisoningport-blockingip-blockingrst-injectiontls-fingerprintkeyword-filteringdpi

When Turkish users shifted to foreign DNS providers as a circumvention mechanism, Türk Telekom escalated by rerouting traffic destined for Google Public DNS (8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4) to a local DNS server serving false answers (Event E, March 28), causing a rapid drop in Tor and YouTube availability across all Atlas probes regardless of DNS configuration. At least 6 distinct shifts in filtering strategy were documented within a two-week period.

2014-anderson-global §4.1 dns-poisoningip-blockingbgp-hijack

IBR-derived metrics γ (average SYN retransmits per flow) and η (inter-packet time between retransmits) can distinguish packet-loss-induced outages from packet-filtering censorship: during Libya's 2011 packet-filtering phase γC remained near pre-censorship values despite reduced source counts, whereas BGP route leaks caused measurable γ decreases and η increases. This difference exists because filtering reduces the host population but preserves per-flow OS retransmit behavior, while congestion causes routers to drop individual packets mid-flow.

2013-benson-gaining §IV-C, §IV-D measurement-platformip-blockingbgp-hijack

Libya's 2011 Internet shutdown combined two distinct censor techniques across separate episodes: BGP-level route withdrawal and later packet filtering. During the packet-filtering episode, γC remained near its pre-censorship baseline (~2.0 packets/flow) even as the number of reachable Conficker sources dropped, confirming that the mechanism was per-subnet allowlisting rather than link saturation.

2013-benson-gaining §IV-C ip-blockingbgp-hijack

Under the Cirripede 'random ASes' deployment scenario — where 0.4%–1.0% of ASes deploy decoy routers — routing-capable wardens need only disconnect themselves from 0.85%–3.04% of the Internet to obtain clean (decoy-free) paths to all remaining destinations. Even at 10% Internet-wide deployment, wardens are cut off from only 7%–9% of non-participating ASes on average.

2012-schuchard-routing §4.2, Figure 2 bgp-hijackip-blocking