IPv6 phantom addresses drawn from an ISP's /32 prefix provide 2^96 potential addresses, making exhaustive enumeration and pre-image attacks computationally infeasible. Analysis of 4013 observed IPv6 addresses in a deployed /32 found approximately 75 bits of entropy (out of a maximum 96), with enough overlap with legitimate address distributions that blocking high-entropy addresses would produce significant collateral damage to real IPv6 services.

Conjure achieves 20% lower latency, 14% faster download bandwidth, and over 1400 times faster upload bandwidth compared to TapDance on a 20 Gbps ISP testbed. TapDance upload is throttled to approximately 0.1 Mbps because it must reconnect for every 32 KBytes sent; Conjure maintains a single persistent connection. At the 99th percentile, Conjure is 281 ms (92%) faster than TapDance.

§6.1 evaluation

For IPv4, Conjure derives both the phantom host IP and TCP port from the client's registration seed, making exhaustive scanning infeasible: a censor enumerating from a /10 of potential client source IPs (4 million addresses) against a /16 of phantom IPs (65K addresses) across all 65K ports would require approximately 50 years at 10 Gbps with ZMap. Phantom hosts are additionally firewalled to respond only to the registering client IP, defeating single-vantage-point ZMap scans.

§6.2.1 defense

Conjure phantom hosts resist active probing by requiring knowledge of a per-client registration seed secret before the station responds. A ZMap scan of over 1 billion random IP/port combinations found that 99.4% of responding servers returned no data after a random OSSH-style probe and 7.42% closed with TCP RST — behavior indistinguishable from Conjure's OSSH transport — meaning censors face steep false-positive rates when attempting to identify phantom proxies via active probing.

§7.1 defense

Conjure registration is unidirectional: the client embeds a steganographic ciphertext tag in a complete HTTPS request payload encrypted under a Diffie-Hellman shared secret, and the station passively observes it without sending any reply or spoofing packets. This design makes registration flows indistinguishable from normal HTTPS traffic and enables 25% more viable registration decoys than TapDance by removing the requirement to exclude decoys with short TCP windows or connection timeouts.

§4.1 defense

The June 2025 Iran shutdown—carried out during the Iran-Israel war beginning ~June 19—did not use BGP route withdrawals as in 2019. Instead, authorities applied service-level restrictions at the national border: DNS poisoning of foreign destinations, protocol whitelisting permitting only pre-approved domestic services, and DPI to block circumvention-tool traffic. Iran's international traffic fell roughly 90% while the country's BGP routes remained advertised, making the shutdown invisible to BGP-based monitoring systems. OONI measurement volume, which totalled 121,333 in June 2025, collapsed to under 200 submissions on June 19-20.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement Executive Summary / §2 dpidns-poisoningport-blockingip-blocking

Article 19 documents that Iran's National Information Network (NIN / SHOMA) was designed with explicit reference to China's Great Firewall as a model, with institutional mirroring: Iran's Supreme Council of Cyberspace parallels China's Cyberspace Administration of China, and both governments share a "cyber sovereignty" doctrine used to justify domestic content controls and cross-border technology transfer. The report frames Iran's filtering infrastructure as deliberately architected to replicate GFW capabilities, not as an independently developed system.

2026-article19-tightening-the-net §2, §3 dpisni-blockingdns-poisoningip-blockingbgp-hijackthrottling

Article 19 documents that Iran combines technical filtering with formal coercion of major foreign platforms (including Telegram, Instagram, and WhatsApp) to comply with content removal orders under threat of full blocking. The report notes that Iran's 2022 Women Life Freedom protests accelerated platform blocking when foreign operators refused compliance, demonstrating that the censorship system operates in two modes: coerce-and-allow for compliant platforms, block for non-compliant ones. Domain fronting via these platforms is therefore subject to sudden revocation if political conditions change.

2026-article19-tightening-the-net §6 ip-blockingdns-poisoningthrottling

Brussee measures a systematic pattern of Chinese government websites actively blocking access from outside China (the "reverse Great Firewall"), publishing a CSV dataset of affected domains (available at zenodo.org/records/18172145). The paper frames this outbound geo-blocking as a cybersecurity-motivated practice — Chinese authorities classify foreign access to domestic government infrastructure as an attack surface — distinct from the inbound information control goal of the GFW.

2026-brussee-reverse-great-firewall §3, §5 ip-blockingasn-blackholing

Brussee develops a conceptual framework distinguishing two logics of government geo-blocking: (1) information control (blocking inbound foreign content from domestic users) and (2) data sovereignty / attack-surface reduction (blocking outbound access by foreign actors to domestic systems). Chinese government site blocking of external IPs is motivated primarily by the second logic, creating an asymmetric internet topology where CN citizens cannot reach the outside world, and outside actors cannot probe CN government infrastructure.

2026-brussee-reverse-great-firewall §2, §4 ip-blockingasn-blackholing

ShieldShare demonstrates that an Android application can route all hotspot-client traffic through a VPN tunnel without root access by using a SOCKS5/HTTP/HTTPS proxy layer between the hotspot and the VPN, with per-client traffic accounting and quota management. The system works because Android's native hotspot does not forward VPN routing tables to connected clients; ShieldShare interposes a proxy that handles this. Released as open-source.

2026-edorh-shieldshare §Abstract ip-blocking