FINDING · EVALUATION
Approximately 60% of users in the 8,400-participant US dataset had a unique overall browser fingerprint when combining 13 standard attributes, matching FingerprintJS's advertised 60% accuracy. Fingerprinting risk followed strict monotonic trends: uniqueness increased with age (65+ group most at risk) and decreased with income (household income under $25,000 group at greatest risk), while males showed more unique overall fingerprints but females showed higher uniqueness on passive-fingerprintable attributes (User-Agent, Languages).
From 2025-berke-unique-whose-web — How Unique is Whose Web Browser? The role of demographics in browser fingerprinting among US users · §4.1, §6.2, §8.2 · 2025 · PoPETs 2025
Implications
- Circumvention tools targeting lower-income or elderly populations should apply browser attribute normalization as a first-class feature — these groups face the highest fingerprinting risk and are therefore most susceptible to cross-session re-identification by censors or adversarial proxies.
- Gender-asymmetric passive fingerprinting (female users more unique via HTTP headers) implies that User-Agent spoofing strategies should aim for a common cross-gender value, not just a plausible one, to avoid demographic leakage.
Tags
Extracted by claude-sonnet-4-6 — review before relying.