FINDING · DETECTION
Of 6,915,266 domains extracted from the 572 GiB Geedge Networks Leak (GNL), 298,955 censored domains (93.7% of all GNL-censored domains) appear in neither Tranco top-1M nor CitizenLab test lists. Measurements across China (Guangzhou/Nanjing), Myanmar, Pakistan, and Algeria confirmed censorship via DNS injection and SNI-based TLS connection termination. The GNL covers 25–62% of Tranco-censored domains across countries, showing substantial but incomplete overlap. This vendor-side ground truth reveals a censorship surface roughly two orders of magnitude larger than curated academic test lists.
From 2026-sheffey-geedge — Geedge Cases: Censorship Measurement Insights from the Geedge Networks Leak · §4.1, Table 2 · 2026 · Free and Open Communications on the Internet
Implications
- Circumvention tools that use domain-fronting or CDN-based proxies should cross-reference their CDN/fronting domain lists against GNL-derived sets to identify domains already flagged by commercial censorship vendors before deploying them as frontends.
- Censorship measurement used to validate Lantern proxy reachability should supplement Tranco/CitizenLab test lists with vendor-leak-derived domain sets; the 93.7% unique rate means standard measurement tools would miss most of what Geedge's customers are blocking.
Tags
Extracted by claude-sonnet-4-6 — review before relying.