SkypeMorph achieves a goodput of 33.9 ± 0.8 KB/s (naïve shaping) and 34 ± 1 KB/s (enhanced Traffic Morphing) versus 200 ± 100 KB/s for a normal Tor bridge, with overhead of ~28% compared to 12% for normal Tor. The two traffic-shaping methods perform statistically identically (KS p > 0.5), but the overhead grows during silent periods because the transport must transmit padding to maintain Skype's constant bitrate even when the Tor buffer is empty.
From 2012-moghaddam-skypemorph — SkypeMorph: Protocol Obfuscation for Tor Bridges
· Table 1, §8
· 2012
· Computer and Communications Security
Implications
Protocol-mimicry transports that enforce a cover protocol's constant transmission rate impose a hard throughput ceiling; designers must accept that goodput will be bounded by the cover protocol's rate regardless of available bandwidth.
Padding budget during low-traffic periods is a predictable cost: plan for ~43 KB/s sustained bandwidth consumption even when user traffic is idle, matching a real Skype video session.