For the same blocked resource (YouTube) in Pakistan, UBICA found at least three distinct ISP-level techniques in parallel: Micronet Broadband and Witribe Pakistan use DNS injection redirecting to explicit blockpages; Pakistan Telecom Company Ltd. returns DNS responses yielding only 11.7% plausible IPs; while Transworld Associates and National Wi-Max/IMS apply HTTP tampering with no DNS interference, confirmed by passing TCP reachability tests but failing content-size ratio checks.
From 2015-aceto-monitoring — Monitoring Internet Censorship with UBICA
· §3.1
· 2015
· Traffic Monitoring and Analysis
Implications
Circumvention tools targeting Pakistan must independently address both DNS injection and HTTP-layer tampering, since different ISPs choose different blocking layers for the same target — a DNS-only fix leaves HTTP-tampering ISPs unremedied.
Use multi-layer probing (DNS plausibility + TCP reachability + content-size ratio) rather than any single signal, since ISP-level diversity causes any one test to produce false negatives on the others.