Pakistan Telecom Company Ltd. implemented DNS injection by returning 127.0.0.1 (localhost) for blocked domains, so TCP connections and HTTP requests appeared to succeed ("Content available" near 100%) while no legitimate content was served. Only 11.7% of DNS resolutions yielded a plausible IP address, yet the symptom is a silent local service response rather than an explicit blockpage, misleading users and confusing automated detection tools that rely on TCP reachability.

In Italy, gambling and betting sites were censored primarily via DNS hijacking toward explicit blockpages with ISP-level plausible-DNS-resolution rates as low as 4.5% (NGI), 31.2% (Wind), and 46.1% (Telecom Italia), while the academic GARR network showed no censorship. File-sharing sites (thepiratebay.sx) faced a more aggressive multi-layer response: 2 of 4 ISPs showed less than 50% TCP reachability (versus near 100% for betting sites), and control DNS resolvers were also affected, indicating coordinated infrastructure-wide blocking rather than ISP-level DNS hijacking alone.

§3.3 evaluation

For the same blocked resource (YouTube) in Pakistan, UBICA found at least three distinct ISP-level techniques in parallel: Micronet Broadband and Witribe Pakistan use DNS injection redirecting to explicit blockpages; Pakistan Telecom Company Ltd. returns DNS responses yielding only 11.7% plausible IPs; while Transworld Associates and National Wi-Max/IMS apply HTTP tampering with no DNS interference, confirmed by passing TCP reachability tests but failing content-size ratio checks.

§3.1 evaluation

In South Korea, adult websites (e.g., hardsextube.com) were censored exclusively via HTTP content substitution — a JavaScript redirect to the official blockpage http://warning.or.kr — with 98% of content-size-ratio samples falling below the 0.3 detection threshold, while no DNS tampering or TCP-level blocking was observed. All other tested countries had fewer than 16% of samples below the threshold.

§3.2 evaluation

UBICA's crowdsourced measurement campaign across 31 countries deployed 200+ probes (47 GUI clients, 188 headless clients, 16 BISmark routers) and tested more than 16,000 targets (~15,000 hostnames) over 4 months. Its content-size ratio algorithm detects blockpage substitution by comparing average resource size per country against a global baseline, using a threshold of 0.3 (midpoint between the two observed distribution modes minus a 0.2 guard interval) without requiring a pre-existing uncensored ground truth.

§2, §3 evaluation

The June 2025 Iran shutdown—carried out during the Iran-Israel war beginning ~June 19—did not use BGP route withdrawals as in 2019. Instead, authorities applied service-level restrictions at the national border: DNS poisoning of foreign destinations, protocol whitelisting permitting only pre-approved domestic services, and DPI to block circumvention-tool traffic. Iran's international traffic fell roughly 90% while the country's BGP routes remained advertised, making the shutdown invisible to BGP-based monitoring systems. OONI measurement volume, which totalled 121,333 in June 2025, collapsed to under 200 submissions on June 19-20.

2025-iran-shutdown-measurement Executive Summary / §2 dpidns-poisoningport-blockingip-blocking

Article 19 documents that Iran's National Information Network (NIN / SHOMA) was designed with explicit reference to China's Great Firewall as a model, with institutional mirroring: Iran's Supreme Council of Cyberspace parallels China's Cyberspace Administration of China, and both governments share a "cyber sovereignty" doctrine used to justify domestic content controls and cross-border technology transfer. The report frames Iran's filtering infrastructure as deliberately architected to replicate GFW capabilities, not as an independently developed system.

2026-article19-tightening-the-net §2, §3 dpisni-blockingdns-poisoningip-blockingbgp-hijackthrottling

Article 19 documents that Iran combines technical filtering with formal coercion of major foreign platforms (including Telegram, Instagram, and WhatsApp) to comply with content removal orders under threat of full blocking. The report notes that Iran's 2022 Women Life Freedom protests accelerated platform blocking when foreign operators refused compliance, demonstrating that the censorship system operates in two modes: coerce-and-allow for compliant platforms, block for non-compliant ones. Domain fronting via these platforms is therefore subject to sudden revocation if political conditions change.

2026-article19-tightening-the-net §6 ip-blockingdns-poisoningthrottling

Both Firefox and Chromium leak cleartext DNS before establishing encrypted DNS connections: they first send an unencrypted UDP DNS query to resolve the DoH server's domain (e.g., doh.opendns.com). An in-path censor can intercept and poison this initial query, making encrypted DNS in browsers completely ineffective without additional circumvention of the resolver-lookup step. Additionally, Chromium always includes the SNI extension in the encrypted DNS TLS handshake (e.g., "doh.opendns.com"), leaking the resolver identity even after the initial lookup. No resolver requires SNI to be present for certificate validation when the resolver's IP certificate is configured.

2026-lange-towards §2.4, §7, §10 dns-poisoningsni-blocking

DNS censorship of encrypted protocols is inconsistent in both China and Iran. In China, Yandex resolvers are censored only when the SNI extension is present; omitting SNI bypasses censorship for these resolvers. In Iran, DoH requires SNI omission for Quad9, Google, Adguard, CleanBrowsing, and NextDNS resolvers, but works with SNI for Yandex and Cisco resolvers. These inconsistencies suggest resolvers have been accidentally missed by censors, highlighting the value of automated tools that trial all resolver-mode combinations rather than hard-coding a single strategy. The support evaluation found 47 resolvers supporting DoH, 16 supporting DoH3, and only 8 supporting DoQ out of ~65 tested.

2026-lange-towards §6.2, Table 2 dns-poisoningsni-blockingip-blocking

DPYProxy-DNS tested 8 circumvention modes against DNS censorship from vantage points in Iran (AS201295, Mashhad) and China (AS4837, China Unicom). In Iran, DoQ was entirely uncensored even with the SNI extension present; DoH3 worked for all Cloudflare and NextDNS resolvers. Iran's censor operates in-path (not on-path like the GFW), making the "Last Response" mode (wait 3s for the last UDP reply) ineffective in Iran but highly effective in China. Auto-mode averaged 12.32s (median 8.28s) in Iran and 13.78s (median 12.90s) in China to discover a working combination.

2026-lange-towards §6.2, §6.3 dns-poisoningsni-blockingip-blocking