The study's three vantage points (US university, AWS Sydney, AWS Tokyo) produce substantially different transit censorship observations: the US vantage point detects blockpages in all 8 affected countries, while Sydney and Tokyo detect transit censorship only in Kazakhstan and Ukraine. This variance is attributed to routing path differences across vantage points, confirming that transit censorship coverage is highly path-dependent.

AS201776 (Miranda-Media Ltd) is responsible for the largest volume of Russian transit censorship by destination IP count, affecting approximately 16,000 IP addresses in Ukraine from US and Sydney vantage points. AS3216 (PJSC Vimpelcom) has the widest geographic reach—delivering blockpages for traffic destined to 8 countries—but impacts no more than 1,000 IP addresses per country from any single vantage point.

§5 Preliminary Results / Table 1 evaluation

The authors' blockpage-based methodology cannot detect transit censorship implemented via TCP RST injection or packet drops, because distinguishing these from transient network errors requires identifying their location on the routing path. As a result, the 8-country, 6-AS finding is explicitly characterized as a lower bound on the true extent of Russian transit censorship.

§4.1 Gathering Blockpages / §6 Conclusion evaluation

Scanning the IP address spaces of 18 countries surrounding Russia, the authors identify Russian transit censorship affecting at least 8 countries (Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, South Korea, Tajikistan, and Ukraine), attributable to at least 6 Russian ASes. Only 2 of these 8 countries (Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan) had been reported in prior work, and the collateral damage is characterized as a lower bound due to the study's blockpage-only methodology.

§5 Preliminary Results evaluation

AS60299 (Mezhdugorodnyaya Mezhdunarodnaya Telefonnaya Stanciya Ltd) and AS201776 (Miranda-Media Ltd) deploy commercial DPI technology manufactured by Russian company VAS Experts to perform transit censorship. Ukraine is subject to transit censorship by the most Russian ASes (at least 5: AS3216, AS25227, AS35816, AS47203, AS201776), likely due to post-2022 re-routing of Ukrainian Internet traffic through Russian telecommunications infrastructure.

§5 Preliminary Results deployment

Analyzing over 3 million OONI network measurements (2016–2020) from 17 ASes covering 98.45% of broadband and 90.94% of mobile subscribers in Spain, the study detected 16 unique blockpages, 2 DPI vendors (Fortinet/Fortigate in Telefonica; Allot in Vodafone), and 78 blocked websites across copyright, political, civil-rights, and referendum categories.

2021-ververis-understanding §3, §4 dpidns-poisoningpacket-injectionsni-blockingmeasurement-platform

Page length comparison at a 30.19% size-difference threshold achieves a 95.03% true positive rate and 1.371% false positive rate for block page detection, outperforming DOM similarity (95.35% TP, 3.732% FP) on false positive rate and cosine similarity (97.94% TP, 1.938% FP, 74.23% precision) on precision. These metrics were evaluated via ten-fold cross-validation on the ONI dataset of ~500,000 entries from 49 countries spanning 2007–2012.

2014-jones-automated §4.2, Table 1 dpimeasurement-platformpacket-injection

The largest single source of censored domains in the GNL is MESA lab's SNI monitoring dataset (E21-SNI-Top200w.txt) containing 57,362 censored domains, and E21-SNI-Top120W-20221020.txt with 36,467 domains—totaling over 93K domains from network tap data alone for a single country (E21 = Ethiopia per InterSecLab attribution). A separate Xinjiang dataset (XJ-CUCC-SNI-Top200w.txt) contains 13,604 domains. These datasets "do not seem to come from popular domain lists, and instead appear to be gathered from network taps," confirming that Geedge builds censorship target lists directly from passive traffic observation.

2026-sheffey-geedge §4.2, Table 3 dpisni-blockingmeasurement-platform

Of 6,915,266 domains extracted from the 572 GiB Geedge Networks Leak (GNL), 298,955 censored domains (93.7% of all GNL-censored domains) appear in neither Tranco top-1M nor CitizenLab test lists. Measurements across China (Guangzhou/Nanjing), Myanmar, Pakistan, and Algeria confirmed censorship via DNS injection and SNI-based TLS connection termination. The GNL covers 25–62% of Tranco-censored domains across countries, showing substantial but incomplete overlap. This vendor-side ground truth reveals a censorship surface roughly two orders of magnitude larger than curated academic test lists.

2026-sheffey-geedge §4.1, Table 2 dpisni-blockingdns-poisoningmeasurement-platform

Iran's censorship of refraction-networking proxies (Conjure via Psiphon) is not monolithic: different ISPs independently deploy different techniques and timelines. Over 800 million logged Conjure connections from July 2023–February 2025 across 10+ Iranian ASes show TCI (AS58224, ~33% of traffic) uses packet injection, while MCCI/Hamrah-e Avval (AS197207, ~22%) applies IP-based blocking, and some ASes (Parsonline AS16322, Shatel AS31549) show no proxy blocking at all.

2025-alaraj-iran-refraction §4 rst-injectionip-blockingpacket-injectiondpi

The GFI's HTTP and HTTPS filters are now stateful (requiring initial SYN packet with matching sequence numbers) and have been activated on all TCP ports—not only standard ports 80 and 443 as reported by prior studies. This is a significant departure from previous work that found stateless HTTP/HTTPS blocking limited to standard ports. The HTTP filter injects a 403 Forbidden blockpage (not RST packets as used by the GFW), while HTTPS injects a single RST+ACK packet. The GFI also exhibits TCP non-compliance (not requiring a full three-way handshake to trigger filtering), enabling outside-in measurement without in-country servers.

2025-tai-irblock §2.1, §3.2 dpirst-injectionpacket-injectionmiddlebox-interference