DEMUX achieves a P@5 of 0.943 and MAP@5 of 0.961 in the closed-world 5-tab multi-tab website fingerprinting setting, outperforming the strongest prior baseline (ARES'25) by 9.2 and 6.2 percentage points respectively. ARES'25's P@K degrades from 0.900 at 2-tab to 0.851 at 5-tab (a drop of 4.9 pp), while DEMUX improves from 0.926 to 0.943 over the same range, expanding the absolute margin from 2.6 to over 9 points.

A plug-and-play Boundary Preserving Aggregation Module (overlapping window partitioning with joint packet- and burst-level features, W=20ms, stride=10ms) consistently improves existing WF baselines without architectural modification: applied to DF, AUC rises from 0.780 to 0.901 and P@5 from 0.315 to 0.545; applied to ARES'25, P@5 rises from 0.869 to 0.900 in the open-world 5-tab setting. The module's consistent gains across all three tested baselines confirm that fixed non-overlapping window segmentation is a structural vulnerability in prior WF pipelines.

§V-G, Figure 5 detection

In the open-world 5-tab setting — where each trace contains one unmonitored site, substantially increasing noise and class imbalance — DEMUX achieves AUC of 0.998, P@5 of 0.951, and MAP@5 of 0.966, while ARES'25 achieves 0.988/0.869/0.911. DEMUX's advantage widens in the open-world setting (the P@5 gap grows from 2.6 pp to 8.2 pp versus closed-world), confirming that state-of-the-art WF attacks are not defeated by open-world conditions or unmonitored co-browsing traffic.

§V-C, Table III detection

The Traffic Aggregation Matrix (TAM) representation used by the RF baseline — which counts directional packet counts over fixed time slots rather than tracking per-packet sequences — shows unexpectedly strong robustness under TrafficSliver, achieving P@2 of 0.702, substantially exceeding all other CNN-based methods under that defense. Var-CNN similarly achieves P@2 of 0.826 under TrafficSliver despite mediocre no-defense performance, suggesting that tolerance to partial packet loss is architecturally separable from peak single-observer accuracy.

§V-D, Table IV evaluation

Under the TrafficSliver defense — which splits traffic across multiple Tor entry nodes so no single observer sees more than a partial fraction of packets — TMWF collapses to a P@2 of 0.399 and ARES'23 to 0.429, while DEMUX retains a P@2 of 0.940, exceeding the next-best competitor by 2.5 points. WTF-PAD and FRONT are substantially weaker defenses, with most methods maintaining near-baseline performance under WTF-PAD.

§V-D, Table IV evaluation

With infinite training time, Laserbeak achieves 93.5%, 95.9%, and 95.9% accuracy against ephemeral padding, FRONT, and Interspace respectively, compared to 96.5% undefended — confirming that padding-only defenses provide no meaningful protection against a sufficiently trained deep-learning WF adversary. Only ephemeral blocking defenses retain measurable protection, reducing Laserbeak to 71.8% accuracy under infinite training versus 96.5% undefended.

2026-pulls-ephemeral-network-layer-fingerprinting §5.3, Table 2 ml-classifierwebsite-fingerprinttraffic-shape

Censorship classifiers and traffic analysis attacks consistently exploit the initial seconds of a proxy connection, where packet-size, inter-arrival-time, and burst features are maximally discriminative. Cited work demonstrates that website fingerprinting classifiers trained solely on the first few seconds of Tor traffic achieve high accuracy, and real-world GFW detection of fully-encrypted protocols also targets early-connection bytes.

2025-pereira-extended §1 traffic-shapewebsite-fingerprintml-classifierdpifully-encrypted-detect

The framework's GAN-based schedule generator trains on short session windows (e.g., the first 10 seconds) of real browsing traffic from the Tranco Top 1000 sites, learning joint distributions of packet sizes, inter-arrival times, and burst patterns to produce realistic synthetic schedules. This repurposes GAN architectures previously used for traffic analysis (e.g., GANDaLF) as a defense-side cover-traffic generator.

2025-pereira-extended §2.2 traffic-shapewebsite-fingerprintml-classifier

Circuit fingerprinting from a guard-relay position achieves ≥99.9% accuracy with FPR ≤0.1% for all four Tor circuit types (general, HSDir, introductory, rendezvous) using the Deep Fingerprinting classifier on the first 512 cells, despite Tor's deployed partial defenses. Onion-Location fingerprinting (OLF) combining these circuit classifiers then achieves 98.81–99.87% accuracy (FPR 0.16–1.23%) distinguishing O-L sessions from ordinary clearnet or onion-only visits.

2025-syverson-onion-location-measurements-fingerprinting §5.1–5.2 traffic-shapeml-classifierwebsite-fingerprint

Combinations of Bayesian methods, data augmentation with mixup, and NOTA defensive padding cut the open-world false positive rate by up to 92% at 0.5 recall on HTTPS-only traffic and 75% on Tor traffic relative to the deterministic MSP baseline. Even with these improvements, sustaining a world size in the hundreds of millions (approaching YouTube-scale) requires accepting recall of 0.5–0.6 and precision of only 0.1–0.2; at precision 0.5 and recall 0.5, the maximum workable world size is only 37.5M for HTTPS-only (Table 3), far below YouTube's ~10 billion video catalog.

2025-walsh-improved-open-world-fingerprinting §4.5, Tables 1–3 website-fingerprintml-classifiertraffic-shape

When a fingerprinting model is trained on traffic collected from one geographic vantage point and tested on traffic from a different continent, the HTTPS-only open-world FPR at 0.5 recall increased by factors ranging from 2.8x (EU-West-2) to 50.3x (Africa) relative to the same-vantage baseline — despite 60-way closed-world accuracy remaining above 0.99 across all vantage-point pairs (Table 5). For Tor traffic the effect was weaker but still reached 25.2x (Asia-Pacific Southeast-1), showing path diversity also disrupts Tor-based fingerprinting.

2025-walsh-improved-open-world-fingerprinting §5.1, Table 5 website-fingerprintml-classifiertraffic-shape